<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1658 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361094</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, restoring the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling in favor of the appellant, nullifying the basis for the recovery of the erroneously granted refund under Section 11A. The High Court&#039;s decision allowed the appeal, validating the Commissioner (Appeals) order on the refund application within the limitation period and confirming the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s approval of the refund as correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1658 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361094</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, restoring the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling in favor of the appellant, nullifying the basis for the recovery of the erroneously granted refund under Section 11A. The High Court&#039;s decision allowed the appeal, validating the Commissioner (Appeals) order on the refund application within the limitation period and confirming the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s approval of the refund as correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>