<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1743 - ITAT AHMEDABAD.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272987</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the order passed under section 206C of the Income Tax Act was deemed time-barred by ITAT Ahmedabad, emphasizing the necessity of a reasonable time limit for such orders. The classification of steel plates and materials from ship recycling as &quot;scrap&quot; was not addressed in detail due to the time-barred nature of the order. The appellant&#039;s status as an &quot;Assessee in default&quot; and liability to collect tax at source were confirmed by CIT(A) but not extensively analyzed by ITAT Ahmedabad. Other issues raised by the appellant regarding tax collection, purchasers&#039; tax payments, penalty initiation, and alleged breaches of law were not thoroughly examined due to the primary focus on the timeliness of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 09:51:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1743 - ITAT AHMEDABAD.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272987</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the order passed under section 206C of the Income Tax Act was deemed time-barred by ITAT Ahmedabad, emphasizing the necessity of a reasonable time limit for such orders. The classification of steel plates and materials from ship recycling as &quot;scrap&quot; was not addressed in detail due to the time-barred nature of the order. The appellant&#039;s status as an &quot;Assessee in default&quot; and liability to collect tax at source were confirmed by CIT(A) but not extensively analyzed by ITAT Ahmedabad. Other issues raised by the appellant regarding tax collection, purchasers&#039; tax payments, penalty initiation, and alleged breaches of law were not thoroughly examined due to the primary focus on the timeliness of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>