<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1442 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272991</link>
    <description>The appeals involved challenges against processing fees charged under sections 200A and 234E before 1.6.15. The appellant argued that the fee was not an adjustment under section 200A but a separate charge based on the TDS statement filing date. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal held that before 01.06.2015, there was no provision for raising a demand regarding the levy of fee under section 234E. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, and the levy of the fee was deleted for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1442 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272991</link>
      <description>The appeals involved challenges against processing fees charged under sections 200A and 234E before 1.6.15. The appellant argued that the fee was not an adjustment under section 200A but a separate charge based on the TDS statement filing date. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal held that before 01.06.2015, there was no provision for raising a demand regarding the levy of fee under section 234E. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, and the levy of the fee was deleted for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>