<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings and subsequent penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) were invalid due to the non-specific nature of the &#039;Show cause&#039; notice. The penalty of Rs. 12,14,140/- was quashed, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the penalty but focused on the procedural deficiency in the penalty initiation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 09:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings and subsequent penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) were invalid due to the non-specific nature of the &#039;Show cause&#039; notice. The penalty of Rs. 12,14,140/- was quashed, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the penalty but focused on the procedural deficiency in the penalty initiation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>