<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1165 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272982</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the labor charges addition as the Assessing Officer failed to prove the expenditure was excessive. However, the estimated addition of depreciation was set aside for re-verification by the Assessing Officer due to new evidence admitted without confrontation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 16:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1165 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272982</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the labor charges addition as the Assessing Officer failed to prove the expenditure was excessive. However, the estimated addition of depreciation was set aside for re-verification by the Assessing Officer due to new evidence admitted without confrontation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>