https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272981 The High Court of Madras affirmed the jurisdiction of the Labour Court under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, allowing it to address issues concerning arrears of salary and benefits. The Court interpreted the term "benefit" expansively, encompassing both monetary and non-monetary benefits necessitating monetary valuation. The Court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the respondent and awarding costs. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 May 2018 16:08:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272981 The High Court of Madras affirmed the jurisdiction of the Labour Court under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, allowing it to address issues concerning arrears of salary and benefits. The Court interpreted the term "benefit" expansively, encompassing both monetary and non-monetary benefits necessitating monetary valuation. The Court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the respondent and awarding costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272981