<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13180</link>
    <description>The court remitted the case back to the Tribunal solely to reconsider the applicability of section 32(1A) to the claim related to wooden partitions, while upholding the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions on other expenses. The court directed the Tribunal to rehear the appeal specifically on the applicability of section 32(1A to the claim associated with wooden partitions, while affirming the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions on other expenses as not warranting interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:12:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13180</link>
      <description>The court remitted the case back to the Tribunal solely to reconsider the applicability of section 32(1A) to the claim related to wooden partitions, while upholding the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions on other expenses. The court directed the Tribunal to rehear the appeal specifically on the applicability of section 32(1A to the claim associated with wooden partitions, while affirming the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions on other expenses as not warranting interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>