<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1631 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) applies retrospectively. The deletion of the disallowance by the CIT(A) was upheld, ensuring that no disallowance is made if the recipient has included the interest in their income and paid the corresponding tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 09:00:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1631 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) applies retrospectively. The deletion of the disallowance by the CIT(A) was upheld, ensuring that no disallowance is made if the recipient has included the interest in their income and paid the corresponding tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>