<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1625 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361061</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting redemption of confiscated gold upon payment of duty and a fine for one appellant. Penalties imposed on others were set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence. The judgment highlighted the inadmissibility of retracted statements without proper examination and the need for independent evidence to support smuggling allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1625 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361061</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting redemption of confiscated gold upon payment of duty and a fine for one appellant. Penalties imposed on others were set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence. The judgment highlighted the inadmissibility of retracted statements without proper examination and the need for independent evidence to support smuggling allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>