<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1621 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361057</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to decide the refund claims considering the clarified relevant date for time limits and allowing the appellant to submit missing invoice details for one of the rejected claims. The decision upheld the principles of natural justice and emphasized a fair review process for the refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 08:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1621 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361057</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to decide the refund claims considering the clarified relevant date for time limits and allowing the appellant to submit missing invoice details for one of the rejected claims. The decision upheld the principles of natural justice and emphasized a fair review process for the refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>