https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361056 The appeal was remanded by the Judicial Member to the original authority for disposal in accordance with the Larger Bench decision clarifying the relevant date for computing the period of one year for refund claims under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The appellant's contention that the date of receipt of consideration should be the relevant date for the time limit was upheld, leading to the appeal being disposed of by way of remand to ensure compliance with the Larger Bench decision. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 May 2018 08:35:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361056 The appeal was remanded by the Judicial Member to the original authority for disposal in accordance with the Larger Bench decision clarifying the relevant date for computing the period of one year for refund claims under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The appellant's contention that the date of receipt of consideration should be the relevant date for the time limit was upheld, leading to the appeal being disposed of by way of remand to ensure compliance with the Larger Bench decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361056