https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361051 In proceedings concerning alleged inconsistencies in the petitioner's pleadings and discrepancies in the record, the HC required factual verification before addressing any allegation of abuse of process. The Court noted the need to clarify the petitioner's proprietorship, the circumstances in which the reply to the show cause notice under Section 129(3) was filed, and whether misleading averments had been made. It directed the respondents to place the relevant facts on affidavit, permitted a rejoinder, exempted the officials from personal appearance on the next date, and listed the matter for further hearing. en-us Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361051 In proceedings concerning alleged inconsistencies in the petitioner's pleadings and discrepancies in the record, the HC required factual verification before addressing any allegation of abuse of process. The Court noted the need to clarify the petitioner's proprietorship, the circumstances in which the reply to the show cause notice under Section 129(3) was filed, and whether misleading averments had been made. It directed the respondents to place the relevant facts on affidavit, permitted a rejoinder, exempted the officials from personal appearance on the next date, and listed the matter for further hearing. Case-Laws GST Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361051