<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1556 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, ruling in favor of deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the IT Act. The decision was pronounced on 23/11/2016, setting aside the Revenue Authorities&#039; orders and citing precedent that if assessments were completed under section 143(3) and subsequent compliances were made, earlier defaults should be ignored. The assesses were found to have a reasonable cause for non-appearance, leading to the unjustified levy of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1556 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, ruling in favor of deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the IT Act. The decision was pronounced on 23/11/2016, setting aside the Revenue Authorities&#039; orders and citing precedent that if assessments were completed under section 143(3) and subsequent compliances were made, earlier defaults should be ignored. The assesses were found to have a reasonable cause for non-appearance, leading to the unjustified levy of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>