<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1126 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272972</link>
    <description>Section 153A assessment for AY 2004-05 was challenged on the absence of incriminating material, alongside the sustainability of profit estimation after rejection of books under Section 145(3) and the ITAT&#039;s failure to decide the ground on alleged unaccounted capital used for unaccounted purchases. The appeal was admitted, additional documents were permitted to be filed within eight weeks, and the matter was directed to be listed in due course.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1126 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272972</link>
      <description>Section 153A assessment for AY 2004-05 was challenged on the absence of incriminating material, alongside the sustainability of profit estimation after rejection of books under Section 145(3) and the ITAT&#039;s failure to decide the ground on alleged unaccounted capital used for unaccounted purchases. The appeal was admitted, additional documents were permitted to be filed within eight weeks, and the matter was directed to be listed in due course.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>