https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272967 The court ruled against impleading the legal representatives in a company appeal under the Civil Procedure Code and Companies Act. It held that allegations of oppression against a deceased director cannot be attributed to their legal representatives, who are now ordinary shareholders with no management connection. The judgment emphasized the distinction between directorial actions and shareholder actions, concluding that no cause of action existed against the legal representatives. The court interpreted the legislative intent behind section 398 of the Companies Act, limiting the powers conferred and dismissing the application to implead legal representatives in the case. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 May 2018 16:40:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272967 The court ruled against impleading the legal representatives in a company appeal under the Civil Procedure Code and Companies Act. It held that allegations of oppression against a deceased director cannot be attributed to their legal representatives, who are now ordinary shareholders with no management connection. The judgment emphasized the distinction between directorial actions and shareholder actions, concluding that no cause of action existed against the legal representatives. The court interpreted the legislative intent behind section 398 of the Companies Act, limiting the powers conferred and dismissing the application to implead legal representatives in the case. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272967