https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272962 Specific performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is an equitable and discretionary remedy, and a claimant must approach the court with clean hands. The plaintiff's false and discrepant pleas regarding possession, disclosure of the agreement, and alleged additional payment undermined entitlement to relief. Concurrent findings also established that the third respondent was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the prior agreement. On those factual findings, refusal of specific performance was justified and no interference was warranted. en-us Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 May 2018 15:20:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272962 Specific performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is an equitable and discretionary remedy, and a claimant must approach the court with clean hands. The plaintiff's false and discrepant pleas regarding possession, disclosure of the agreement, and alleged additional payment undermined entitlement to relief. Concurrent findings also established that the third respondent was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the prior agreement. On those factual findings, refusal of specific performance was justified and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272962