<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1605 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361041</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the CIT(A). The tribunal emphasized the necessity of a specific charge in the show cause notice under Section 274 for penalties under Section 271(1)(c) to be valid, in line with principles of natural justice. The appeal outcome favored the assessee, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness in tax penalty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 10:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1605 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361041</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the CIT(A). The tribunal emphasized the necessity of a specific charge in the show cause notice under Section 274 for penalties under Section 271(1)(c) to be valid, in line with principles of natural justice. The appeal outcome favored the assessee, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness in tax penalty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>