<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1604 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the decision to delete the addition of undisclosed investment in the house property and restricting the addition towards closing stock. However, the disallowance of expenses incurred on advertisement and publicity expenditure was upheld, as the expenses were deemed unnecessary for the business and lacked proper documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1604 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the decision to delete the addition of undisclosed investment in the house property and restricting the addition towards closing stock. However, the disallowance of expenses incurred on advertisement and publicity expenditure was upheld, as the expenses were deemed unnecessary for the business and lacked proper documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>