<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1602 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361038</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the income from commodity trading, recorded in other documents and declared in the return, did not constitute &quot;undisclosed income&quot; as defined under Section 271AAB. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the AO was not justified. Both appeals by the revenue were dismissed, and the deletion of the penalty under Section 271AAB by the CIT(A) was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 10:43:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1602 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361038</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the income from commodity trading, recorded in other documents and declared in the return, did not constitute &quot;undisclosed income&quot; as defined under Section 271AAB. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the AO was not justified. Both appeals by the revenue were dismissed, and the deletion of the penalty under Section 271AAB by the CIT(A) was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>