<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1591 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271AAB was unjustified as the commodity profit did not constitute &quot;undisclosed income.&quot; The penalty was deleted, emphasizing the discretionary nature of Section 271AAB and the importance of strict interpretation of penalty provisions. Additionally, it was highlighted that the assessee was not obligated to maintain books of account under Section 44AA. The order was pronounced on 23.05.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1591 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271AAB was unjustified as the commodity profit did not constitute &quot;undisclosed income.&quot; The penalty was deleted, emphasizing the discretionary nature of Section 271AAB and the importance of strict interpretation of penalty provisions. Additionally, it was highlighted that the assessee was not obligated to maintain books of account under Section 44AA. The order was pronounced on 23.05.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>