<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1590 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the waiver of the principal loan amount under a one-time settlement with the bank should be treated as capital in nature and not taxable as business income under Section 41(1) or Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by various judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1590 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the waiver of the principal loan amount under a one-time settlement with the bank should be treated as capital in nature and not taxable as business income under Section 41(1) or Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by various judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>