<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1575 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361011</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, quashing the penalty notices and related proceedings due to lack of specificity in the penalty notices. The tribunal found the penalty imposition invalid as the notices did not specify the grounds under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, rendering the penalty proceedings void ab initio.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1575 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361011</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, quashing the penalty notices and related proceedings due to lack of specificity in the penalty notices. The tribunal found the penalty imposition invalid as the notices did not specify the grounds under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, rendering the penalty proceedings void ab initio.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>