<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1568 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, following the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in the BSNL case. The impugned order was set aside, and the matters were remanded to the Original Authority for a fresh decision on the jurisdiction issue after the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Mangali Impex Ltd. The status quo was maintained until a final decision is reached, with all parties agreeing to the remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 07:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1568 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, following the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in the BSNL case. The impugned order was set aside, and the matters were remanded to the Original Authority for a fresh decision on the jurisdiction issue after the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Mangali Impex Ltd. The status quo was maintained until a final decision is reached, with all parties agreeing to the remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>