<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1565 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the imposition of penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and interest liability before 08.5.2010. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay interest before 8-5-2010 and penalty under Section 76. The late fee imposed under Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994, was upheld, but the demand for interest and penalty post 8-5-2010 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 07:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1565 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the imposition of penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and interest liability before 08.5.2010. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay interest before 8-5-2010 and penalty under Section 76. The late fee imposed under Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994, was upheld, but the demand for interest and penalty post 8-5-2010 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>