<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1564 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361000</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of a 214-day delay in filing the appeal due to a change in staff within the company. However, a penalty was imposed on the appellant, directing them to pay a cost of &amp;amp;8377; 7,000 to the respondent within a month. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the condonation of delay application. Compliance by a specified date was required to conclude the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 07:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1564 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361000</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of a 214-day delay in filing the appeal due to a change in staff within the company. However, a penalty was imposed on the appellant, directing them to pay a cost of &amp;amp;8377; 7,000 to the respondent within a month. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the condonation of delay application. Compliance by a specified date was required to conclude the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>