<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>clerification of word Accessories</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113790</link>
    <description>Where fabricated structural supports are integral to machinery used in manufacture, the materials (MS angles, plates, rounds) used to construct those supports qualify as capital goods for input credit under the user test; this aligns with the apex court&#039;s reasoning that accessories used to form integral parts of a machine are covered by the capital goods definition, superseding contrary earlier Larger Bench precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2018 00:44:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>clerification of word Accessories</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113790</link>
      <description>Where fabricated structural supports are integral to machinery used in manufacture, the materials (MS angles, plates, rounds) used to construct those supports qualify as capital goods for input credit under the user test; this aligns with the apex court&#039;s reasoning that accessories used to form integral parts of a machine are covered by the capital goods definition, superseding contrary earlier Larger Bench precedent.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2018 00:44:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>