https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272950 The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes as the CIT(A) denied the opportunity for cross-examination of the broker, violating the principle of natural justice. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision with directions to allow cross-examination and consider the evidence presented by the assessee regarding the treatment of long term capital gain. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 May 2018 10:32:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272950 The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes as the CIT(A) denied the opportunity for cross-examination of the broker, violating the principle of natural justice. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision with directions to allow cross-examination and consider the evidence presented by the assessee regarding the treatment of long term capital gain. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272950