<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1555 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360991</link>
    <description>Detained goods under the GST enactments were treated as releasable pending adjudication if the petitioner complied with Rule 140(1) of the Kerala GST Rules, 2017. Relying on an earlier Division Bench view, the court also required the competent authority to complete the Section 129 adjudication promptly. The petition was disposed of by directing release of the detained goods forthwith on compliance with Rule 140(1) and by directing completion of adjudication within one week.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1555 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360991</link>
      <description>Detained goods under the GST enactments were treated as releasable pending adjudication if the petitioner complied with Rule 140(1) of the Kerala GST Rules, 2017. Relying on an earlier Division Bench view, the court also required the competent authority to complete the Section 129 adjudication promptly. The petition was disposed of by directing release of the detained goods forthwith on compliance with Rule 140(1) and by directing completion of adjudication within one week.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>