<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13160</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Revenue&#039;s position, ruling that the sale deed constituted a transfer of property ownership, resulting in capital gains liability. The court found that the property had been partitioned earlier, and subsequent transactions confirmed a transfer had occurred. The assessee&#039;s arguments were dismissed, and the court affirmed the Revenue&#039;s orders and Tribunal&#039;s decision. The case was resolved in favor of the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13160</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Revenue&#039;s position, ruling that the sale deed constituted a transfer of property ownership, resulting in capital gains liability. The court found that the property had been partitioned earlier, and subsequent transactions confirmed a transfer had occurred. The assessee&#039;s arguments were dismissed, and the court affirmed the Revenue&#039;s orders and Tribunal&#039;s decision. The case was resolved in favor of the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>