<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Burden of Proof in FEMA: Responsibility Lies with the Asserting Party, No Reverse Burden Unlike PMLA, Section 3(a) Explained.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39585</link>
    <description>Violation of Section 3(a), FEMA - onus to prove - It is settled legal principle that onus of proof, in both civil and criminal law, is on the person who wishes to prove a particular fact - There is no statutory provision in FEMA imposing reverse evidentiary burden upon an accused person, as is the case under PMLA. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 07:59:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 07:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Burden of Proof in FEMA: Responsibility Lies with the Asserting Party, No Reverse Burden Unlike PMLA, Section 3(a) Explained.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39585</link>
      <description>Violation of Section 3(a), FEMA - onus to prove - It is settled legal principle that onus of proof, in both civil and criminal law, is on the person who wishes to prove a particular fact - There is no statutory provision in FEMA imposing reverse evidentiary burden upon an accused person, as is the case under PMLA. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 07:59:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>