https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360966 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the Enforcement Directorate had wrongly implicated him for alleged contravention of Section 9(1)(b) of FERA due to mistaken identity. The evidence presented failed to establish a clear connection between the appellant and the alleged offenses, highlighting discrepancies and lack of clarity in identifying the offender. The tribunal concluded that the appellant and the individual mentioned in the documents were distinct persons, leading to the appeal being allowed based on the findings of mistaken identity and insufficient evidence against the appellant. en-us Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 May 2018 07:56:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360966 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the Enforcement Directorate had wrongly implicated him for alleged contravention of Section 9(1)(b) of FERA due to mistaken identity. The evidence presented failed to establish a clear connection between the appellant and the alleged offenses, highlighting discrepancies and lack of clarity in identifying the offender. The tribunal concluded that the appellant and the individual mentioned in the documents were distinct persons, leading to the appeal being allowed based on the findings of mistaken identity and insufficient evidence against the appellant. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360966