<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13158</link>
    <description>Section 311 CrPC permits additional witnesses to be summoned or examined only when their evidence is essential to a just decision of the case, not to cure omissions in the prosecution evidence. Where the prosecution had already examined the witnesses initially named, had not shown any inability to secure the remaining witnesses earlier, and sought their examination only after the trial had substantially progressed and the accused had been questioned under Section 313, the request was treated as an attempt to fill lacunae. On those facts, the Magistrate&#039;s order allowing additional witnesses was unjustified and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:14:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13158</link>
      <description>Section 311 CrPC permits additional witnesses to be summoned or examined only when their evidence is essential to a just decision of the case, not to cure omissions in the prosecution evidence. Where the prosecution had already examined the witnesses initially named, had not shown any inability to secure the remaining witnesses earlier, and sought their examination only after the trial had substantially progressed and the accused had been questioned under Section 313, the request was treated as an attempt to fill lacunae. On those facts, the Magistrate&#039;s order allowing additional witnesses was unjustified and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>