<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 80 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13157</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of Rs.1,12,810 under rule 6D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for the assessment year 1976-77. The Court determined that the rule covers all expenses incurred by an employee during travel and stay away from headquarters for business purposes, without distinguishing between travel and stay expenses. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the conclusions of the Tribunal regarding the interpretation and application of rule 6D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 80 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13157</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of Rs.1,12,810 under rule 6D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for the assessment year 1976-77. The Court determined that the rule covers all expenses incurred by an employee during travel and stay away from headquarters for business purposes, without distinguishing between travel and stay expenses. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the conclusions of the Tribunal regarding the interpretation and application of rule 6D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>