<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1500 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for the appellant to participate in the proceedings. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the appellant&#039;s genuine reasons, but their failure to respond to the show cause notice and appear before the Commissioner (Appeals) necessitated the remand for the appellant to present their defense effectively. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with the case remanded for further consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 07:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1500 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for the appellant to participate in the proceedings. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the appellant&#039;s genuine reasons, but their failure to respond to the show cause notice and appear before the Commissioner (Appeals) necessitated the remand for the appellant to present their defense effectively. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with the case remanded for further consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>