<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13154</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that a theatre building cannot be classified as a plant for the purpose of claiming a higher rate of depreciation. The court referenced Supreme Court precedents establishing that theatre buildings, like hotel buildings, do not qualify as plants and therefore are not entitled to special depreciation rates. The decision set aside the Tribunal&#039;s ruling and directed the assessing authority to follow the Income-tax Act guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:09:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13154</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that a theatre building cannot be classified as a plant for the purpose of claiming a higher rate of depreciation. The court referenced Supreme Court precedents establishing that theatre buildings, like hotel buildings, do not qualify as plants and therefore are not entitled to special depreciation rates. The decision set aside the Tribunal&#039;s ruling and directed the assessing authority to follow the Income-tax Act guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>