<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1221 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272945</link>
    <description>The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act as the impugned order of CESTAT was only an order of remand and the findings were purely on facts with no substantial question of law. The appeal was dismissed in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 07:18:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1221 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272945</link>
      <description>The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act as the impugned order of CESTAT was only an order of remand and the findings were purely on facts with no substantial question of law. The appeal was dismissed in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>