<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1479 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Arkema Catalyst India Pvt. Ltd. against the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding Customs duty, confiscating goods, and imposing fines and penalties. The dispute centered on discrepancies in the quantity of inputs imported under a DEEC license and the prescribed SION for manufacturing Aluminium Chloride. Relying on High Court decisions, the Tribunal held that Customs Authorities lacked jurisdiction to question the license terms once issued, emphasizing compliance and absence of violation. The decision aligned with previous rulings and emphasized adherence to license terms and notification conditions in Customs duty disputes, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1479 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Arkema Catalyst India Pvt. Ltd. against the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding Customs duty, confiscating goods, and imposing fines and penalties. The dispute centered on discrepancies in the quantity of inputs imported under a DEEC license and the prescribed SION for manufacturing Aluminium Chloride. Relying on High Court decisions, the Tribunal held that Customs Authorities lacked jurisdiction to question the license terms once issued, emphasizing compliance and absence of violation. The decision aligned with previous rulings and emphasized adherence to license terms and notification conditions in Customs duty disputes, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>