<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1473 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the demand on limitation grounds and in favor of the respondent for certain services, including terminal handling charges. It found that the charges were essentially rent for storage space and not taxable as services. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the charges were incentives for cargo space booking and not subject to service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 07:37:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1473 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the demand on limitation grounds and in favor of the respondent for certain services, including terminal handling charges. It found that the charges were essentially rent for storage space and not taxable as services. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the charges were incentives for cargo space booking and not subject to service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>