<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1461 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360897</link>
    <description>Refund rejection based solely on ER-2 returns was held unsustainable where the claimant disputed the return entries and relied on production ledgers and shipping documents to show actual manufacture and export. Because the factum of production required fresh verification, the matter was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration after examining the documents produced and observing natural justice. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 07:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1461 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360897</link>
      <description>Refund rejection based solely on ER-2 returns was held unsustainable where the claimant disputed the return entries and relied on production ledgers and shipping documents to show actual manufacture and export. Because the factum of production required fresh verification, the matter was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration after examining the documents produced and observing natural justice. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>