https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360895 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order-in-original, confirming duty payment and penalties under the Central Excise Act. The Court held that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy of appeal against the order and emphasized the importance of exhausting such remedies before approaching the Court for relief. The judgment highlighted the principle that the Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 is limited when alternative remedies are available, directing the petitioner to pursue the appeal process within a specified timeframe to challenge the impugned orders. en-us Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 May 2018 06:49:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360895 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order-in-original, confirming duty payment and penalties under the Central Excise Act. The Court held that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy of appeal against the order and emphasized the importance of exhausting such remedies before approaching the Court for relief. The judgment highlighted the principle that the Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 is limited when alternative remedies are available, directing the petitioner to pursue the appeal process within a specified timeframe to challenge the impugned orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360895