https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360889 The court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the imposition of redemption fine and penalties. The judge found discrepancies in the weighment process and noted the lack of evidence supporting the alleged shortages and excesses. The absence of updated production records further undermined the Revenue's case. As the goods were not liable for confiscation, the penalties were deemed unjustified. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 May 2018 06:42:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360889 The court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the imposition of redemption fine and penalties. The judge found discrepancies in the weighment process and noted the lack of evidence supporting the alleged shortages and excesses. The absence of updated production records further undermined the Revenue's case. As the goods were not liable for confiscation, the penalties were deemed unjustified. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360889