<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1448 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, directing that the assessment should be finalized based on the actual cost of raw materials supplied by GSK, not the notional value as per Rule 8. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a rational nexus between the facts considered and the conclusions reached, ensuring that the assessment reflects the actual cost of production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 06:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1448 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, directing that the assessment should be finalized based on the actual cost of raw materials supplied by GSK, not the notional value as per Rule 8. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a rational nexus between the facts considered and the conclusions reached, ensuring that the assessment reflects the actual cost of production.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>