https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272928 The High Court directed the petitioners to approach the competent authority for an early hearing of the stay application. The respondents were instructed to cooperate, and no recovery was to be made until the stay application was resolved. If the application was not filed promptly, the competent authority could proceed with recovery. The petitioners could request an early appeal hearing and argue against recovery due to BIFR proceedings. The Court did not assess the case's merits, leaving decisions to the competent authority. The petition was disposed of in line with the Court's orders. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 May 2018 06:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272928 The High Court directed the petitioners to approach the competent authority for an early hearing of the stay application. The respondents were instructed to cooperate, and no recovery was to be made until the stay application was resolved. If the application was not filed promptly, the competent authority could proceed with recovery. The petitioners could request an early appeal hearing and argue against recovery due to BIFR proceedings. The Court did not assess the case's merits, leaving decisions to the competent authority. The petition was disposed of in line with the Court's orders. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272928