<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1719 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272929</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the first appellate authority to finalize the Appeal within four weeks, allowing the petitioners to present their case on merits. The court emphasized that respondent no.2 should not enforce the impugned notices during this period, ensuring a fair resolution of the issues raised in the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 06:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1719 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272929</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the first appellate authority to finalize the Appeal within four weeks, allowing the petitioners to present their case on merits. The court emphasized that respondent no.2 should not enforce the impugned notices during this period, ensuring a fair resolution of the issues raised in the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>