<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1719 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272929</link>
    <description>The petition was disposed of by directing the first appellate authority to decide the pending appeal finally within four weeks after granting the petitioners an opportunity of hearing. Until that decision is taken, the respondents were restrained from insisting on implementation of the impugned notices. The operative effect was interim protection for the petitioners pending expeditious disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 06:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1719 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272929</link>
      <description>The petition was disposed of by directing the first appellate authority to decide the pending appeal finally within four weeks after granting the petitioners an opportunity of hearing. Until that decision is taken, the respondents were restrained from insisting on implementation of the impugned notices. The operative effect was interim protection for the petitioners pending expeditious disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>