<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272917</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that advance income-tax demanded under Section 18A within twelve months before the winding-up order is a tax under Section 230(1)(a) of the Indian Companies Act. The State is entitled to priority over other debts, as ruled by Krishnaswami Nayudu, J. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded to the liquidators recoverable from the company&#039;s assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 17:14:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272917</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that advance income-tax demanded under Section 18A within twelve months before the winding-up order is a tax under Section 230(1)(a) of the Indian Companies Act. The State is entitled to priority over other debts, as ruled by Krishnaswami Nayudu, J. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded to the liquidators recoverable from the company&#039;s assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>