https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272914 The plaintiff's claim was dismissed by the Bombay High Court in 1923 as they failed to prove possession and dispossessal by the defendants. The court held that registration alone does not constitute notice of agreement, and since the defendants had title and possession, the plaintiff's claim was unsuccessful. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 1923 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 15:19:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272914 The plaintiff's claim was dismissed by the Bombay High Court in 1923 as they failed to prove possession and dispossessal by the defendants. The court held that registration alone does not constitute notice of agreement, and since the defendants had title and possession, the plaintiff's claim was unsuccessful. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Jan 1923 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272914