https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272914 Registration of an agreement to sell does not, by itself, constitute notice to a subsequent purchaser. A plaintiff seeking to recover possession on the basis of an earlier agreement must prove prior possession, dispossession, and the facts that entitle him to displace the defendant's title and possession. Where the defendant relies on a registered sale deed, the plaintiff cannot shift the burden by mere assertion of a prior agreement; absence of notice is not required to be proved by the defendant unless the plaintiff first establishes the factual foundation for that claim. The earlier authority relied on was treated as confined to its own facts. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 1923 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 15:19:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272914 Registration of an agreement to sell does not, by itself, constitute notice to a subsequent purchaser. A plaintiff seeking to recover possession on the basis of an earlier agreement must prove prior possession, dispossession, and the facts that entitle him to displace the defendant's title and possession. Where the defendant relies on a registered sale deed, the plaintiff cannot shift the burden by mere assertion of a prior agreement; absence of notice is not required to be proved by the defendant unless the plaintiff first establishes the factual foundation for that claim. The earlier authority relied on was treated as confined to its own facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Jan 1923 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272914