<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 169 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272911</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the winding-up petition was dismissed as an abuse of the court&#039;s process. The court found discrepancies in the terms of the loan agreement, a bona fide dispute regarding the loan amount, and determined that the company&#039;s liability was not established. The petitioning-creditor was ordered to pay the costs of the appellant-company, and the security furnished by the appeal court was discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 14:52:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 169 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272911</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the winding-up petition was dismissed as an abuse of the court&#039;s process. The court found discrepancies in the terms of the loan agreement, a bona fide dispute regarding the loan amount, and determined that the company&#039;s liability was not established. The petitioning-creditor was ordered to pay the costs of the appellant-company, and the security furnished by the appeal court was discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>