https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272909 The High Court allowed the miscellaneous second appeal as a revision, setting aside the lower appellate court's order and restoring the executing court's confirmation of the sale. The court held that no second appeal lies under Section 104(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for an order under Rule 90 of Order XXI. The sale was deemed valid, as there was no substantial injury to the judgment-debtor due to the irregularities. The costs of the review application were to be borne as incurred, while the judgment-debtor was to bear the costs of the second appeal and first appeal. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 14:36:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272909 The High Court allowed the miscellaneous second appeal as a revision, setting aside the lower appellate court's order and restoring the executing court's confirmation of the sale. The court held that no second appeal lies under Section 104(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for an order under Rule 90 of Order XXI. The sale was deemed valid, as there was no substantial injury to the judgment-debtor due to the irregularities. The costs of the review application were to be borne as incurred, while the judgment-debtor was to bear the costs of the second appeal and first appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272909