https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272906 The judgment clarified that both minor and major coparceners are entitled to sue for maintenance out of the joint family property without the necessity of suing for partition. It also affirmed a daughter's right to sue for maintenance against the family manager based on her interest in the joint family property. The case was remanded for further proceedings, with the appellants awarded costs and a refund of court fees. Justice Krishna Swamy Ayyangar concurred, emphasizing that the right to maintenance stems from membership in a joint family with joint property, not solely from personal obligations. en-us Wed, 29 Nov 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 13:27:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272906 The judgment clarified that both minor and major coparceners are entitled to sue for maintenance out of the joint family property without the necessity of suing for partition. It also affirmed a daughter's right to sue for maintenance against the family manager based on her interest in the joint family property. The case was remanded for further proceedings, with the appellants awarded costs and a refund of court fees. Justice Krishna Swamy Ayyangar concurred, emphasizing that the right to maintenance stems from membership in a joint family with joint property, not solely from personal obligations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Nov 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272906