<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1386 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272901</link>
    <description>Imported raw ungarbled betel nuts were treated as releasable on the basis of plant quarantine test results, because no specific standards had been prescribed under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2008 for betel nuts. The court followed earlier authority that, in the absence of such standards, release could rest on available codex standards and precautionary measures only where warranted. Plant quarantine certificates issued under the Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 2003 and the Destructive Insects &amp; Pests Act, 1914 were accepted as sufficient, and further testing or a No Objection Certificate under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2008 was not insisted upon.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 08:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1386 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272901</link>
      <description>Imported raw ungarbled betel nuts were treated as releasable on the basis of plant quarantine test results, because no specific standards had been prescribed under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2008 for betel nuts. The court followed earlier authority that, in the absence of such standards, release could rest on available codex standards and precautionary measures only where warranted. Plant quarantine certificates issued under the Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 2003 and the Destructive Insects &amp; Pests Act, 1914 were accepted as sufficient, and further testing or a No Objection Certificate under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2008 was not insisted upon.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>